Architectural comparison
One operating layer. Not another stack of point solutions.
Health systems stitch together a standalone scribe, a population health dashboard, a value-based care reporting tool and a legacy EMR. IASORA runs documentation, risk stratification, patient engagement and care execution on one patient record.
A single patient record · closed-loop execution · no vendor fragmentation
Point solutions find problems. They do not run the work to done.
The fragmentation problem
Every tool you add is a join made by hand.
A scribe writes the note in a separate app. A population health platform flags a cohort on a dashboard nobody opens. Your clinical staff connect the tools by copy-paste and double entry.
Same five functions. The difference is where the integration lives: in your staff's day, or in the record.
The financial reality
What a fragmented stack costs.
Each looks affordable alone. The total compounds across subscriptions, integrations and admin. Figures are indicative market ranges per category, not any one vendor's quote.
$150 to $300 per provider, per month
Seat-based, so the bill scales with headcount. Staff still re-key the note and codes into the EMR.
$0.50 to $2.00 per member, per month
The bill rises with every attributed life, whatever the contract returned that year.
$50 to $100 per provider, per month, plus usage
Per-message charges on top of the seat fee, and a compliance review for every channel you open.
$50,000 to $200,000 per vendor integration
Then annual API maintenance, security reviews and vendor management for each, plus the middleware.
The consolidated alternative
Documentation, risk stratification, omni-channel messaging and care execution on one platform instead of four to six subscriptions. No per-member software fee, no charge to ingest your own data. Core apps are in every plan; enterprise deployments are scoped and priced with you.
Category alignment
Replace point tools with one closed loop.
Where each category stops, and where the job carries on when it runs on one record.
Clinical documentation
Returns a text note in its own window. Staff still code the visit, pull out care gaps and update the EMR by hand.
Scribe drafts the specialty note, codes it to ICD-10 and SNOMED, and files it to the chart as structured data.
Population health and risk
Ingests claims and returns static risk scores and registries sorted by acuity.
Ranks the panel by preventable risk, names the open care gaps, and starts outreach from the cohort view.
Multi-channel patient engagement
A separate inbox or call centre outside the medical record, where patient conversations live somewhere else.
WhatsApp, SMS and voice outreach against an enforced response window. Replies attach to the chart; bookings write to the schedule.
System of record and EMR integration
A custom API connector per vendor, or a multi-year, multi-million rip-and-replace.
A FHIR overlay that leaves your systems in place, or a full AI-native system of record for a new build. Same architecture.
Enterprise comparison
Side by side.
| Standalone AI scribes | Population health and VBC dashboards | Legacy EMR and HIS | IASORA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core function | Ambient documentation | Risk scoring and reporting | Database and billing record | The full clinical and operational loop |
| Data continuity | An isolated note | Static claims ingestion | Fragmented module silos | One patient record |
| Action execution | None, a text draft only | None, a flag on a screen | Manual staff tasks | AI agents that act, behind a human approval gate |
| Patient engagement | None | Limited, or a third-party add-on | A basic portal | Native voice AI, WhatsApp, SMS and forms |
| Deployment | A desktop or mobile app | A web dashboard over your data | Rip-and-replace | A non-disruptive FHIR overlay, or your full HIS and EMR |
| Governance and privacy | A third-party cloud API | A disconnected claims database | Vendor lock-in | In-region sovereign AI, on-premise tokenisation |
The platform advantage
40+ ready-made agents. One patient record.
Models converge; soon everyone will have a capable one. What lasts is the closed loop on one interoperable record, and the governance around it.
Shared context
What the voice agent learns at reception reaches the scribe during the visit, and the note it files moves the risk score in Care Hub.
Clinician control
Agents handle drafting, scheduling and triage. Anything clinically consequential waits for human approval, and every agent action is logged.
Data sovereignty by design
The Data Privacy Gateway tokenises PHI on-premise, keeping it inside your jurisdiction on cloud, private cloud or air-gapped on-premise.
Get started
Simplify your clinical software stack.
In a working session, we map what you run today against a single operating layer, on your own systems.